A Program Owner’s Guide to Understanding the True Cost of Inaction (COI)
The “It’s Fine” Trap: Many incentive programs feel okay because they’re still working somewhat, but “okay” is the enemy of great. According to recent Maritz research with hundreds of channel participants, there’s a huge difference between incentive programs that just function and those that partners actually love and talk about.
What You’ll Learn: The real costs of outdated programs, how inefficiencies compound over time, missed opportunities and the math behind making a change.
This guide takes about 7 minutes to read top to bottom or you can jump through to the sections you need the most!
Choose Your Own Reading Path:
The Costs You Don’t See Coming
The problem with outdated channel programs isn’t that they fail spectacularly – it’s that they fail quietly. While you’re focused on keeping things running, these hidden costs are eating away at your competitive position in ways that don’t show up until it’s too late.
1. The “It Works But Nobody Cares About It” Problem
This is the most dangerous cost because it feels like everything is fine. Your program processes rewards, partners participate and nothing seems broken. But when partners view your incentives as routine rather than valuable, you’re slowly losing ground in ways that don’t show up in quarterly reports.
Partners Are Getting Bored:
- High-value partners are barely participating in your incentives
- Top performers are checking out competitor programs that offer more interesting rewards
- New partner recruitment is getting harder because your incentives feel “meh”
What this means for you: When partners get bored with your incentives, it happens slowly, so you might not notice you’re losing them until it’s too late. Meanwhile, companies are investing heavily in non-cash rewards and program technology, meaning your partners are seeing these professionally-designed programs from your competitors.
2. The “Everyone Else Is Doing More” Gap
While you’ve been maintaining your current approach, the bar for what partners expect has been rising. Your competitors aren’t just offering different rewards – they’re creating entirely different experiences that make your program look outdated by comparison.
Basic Incentive Problems:
- Programs that only offer cash miss out on what really motivates people long-term
- Simple rebates don’t create excitement or make people talk about your program
- You’re missing the fun stuff like progress tracking, recognition and experiences that partners expect today
What this means for you: When your incentive strategy ignores what actually motivates people, partners participate but they’re not excited about the program
3. The Digital Paperwork Pile-Up
What started as manageable manual processes has quietly grown into a resource drain that’s consuming your team’s strategic capacity. Every hour spent on spreadsheets and manual tracking in an hour not spent on making your program more competitive.
Manual Task Time Sinks:
- Manual incentive processing is eating up more staff time as the program grows
- More errors are creeping in with spreadsheet-based tracking
- Your team is spending more time on paperwork than figuring out how to make the program better
- You’re missing insights that could help you fix problems before partners lose interest
What this means for you: When your team is drowning in paperwork, they can’t think strategically about making your incentives more effective.
4. The “We’ve Always Done It This Way” Problem
Inertia has a cost: it limits your ability to adapt when the market changes. While your program stays static, partner expectations evolve, and competitors experiment with new approaches that gradually make your offerings feel less relevant.
Getting Stuck in the Old Ways
- Basic incentive methods are becoming the default because that’s how you’ve always done it
- You can’t get the data you need to see what’s working and what isn’t
- Your limited incentive options are keeping you from trying new things that could work better
What this means for you: The longer you wait to update your approach, the more expensive it gets to catch up, while competitors with modern programs keep getting further ahead.
5. Losing Ground to Better Programs
The most expensive cost is often the hardest to measure: the opportunities you’re missing while competitors build programs that partners actually get excited about. This isn’t just about losing market share — it’s about losing mindshare and influence with the partners who drive your growth.
The Competition Problem:
- Competitors are launching incentive programs that partners actually get excited about
- You’re losing influence with partners one by one as your program becomes the “basic” option
- You’re missing changes to reward partners for things beyond just sales — like helping customers or promoting your brand
What this means for you: When competitors have better incentives, small gaps become big problems fast — and they’re really hard to close once they get going.
The Compound Effect: How Problems Get Worse Over Time
Looking for specific timeline impacts? This section shows exactly how “good enough” incentive programs turn into real problems.
The Three-Year Decline: How “Fine” Becomes a Crisis
Here’s what most program managers don’t realize: incentive program problems compound quickly. What feels manageable in Year 1 becomes a crisis by Year 3.
Year 1: Everything Seems Fine
This is a danger zone because everything looks normal on the surface, but the foundations of bigger problems are already being laid. Partners seem happy with basic payouts, but there’s no real excitement. Your team handles routine processing without major complaints, but relies increasingly on spreadsheets and manual work. This is actually your best window for making improvements before small inefficiencies turn into big problems.
Year 2: “The Slide” Begins
This is where hidden costs become visible problems, but they’re still manageable if you act quickly. Partners participate less as novelty wears off and show more interest in competitor programs. Admin teams ask for help with incentive management while executives question program value. With 92% of partners actively keeping incentive opportunities in mind during daily tasks, if your program is sliding, you definitely won’t be top of mind.
Year 3: The Real Problems Start
By now, minor inefficiencies have become major competitive disadvantages requiring complete overhauls instead of simple fixes. High-value partners openly explore alternatives, your program reputation shifts from “competitive” to “basic,” and strategic projects get delayed because everyone’s busy with maintenance work.
The financial impact: By Year 3, fixing the problem costs 3-5 times more than preventing it in Year 1 would have cost, while competitors with modern programs have advantages that take years to overcome.
What You’re Missing Out On
Want to see specific missed opportunities? This section shows what modern, well-designed incentive programs can actually do.
While you’re dealing with the problems of outdated programs, competitors with modern incentive programs are capturing opportunities you didn’t even know existed. Here’s what’s possible when you get incentives right.
Research Proof: Research findings confirm that well-designed incentive programs continue to deliver significant performance improvements, particularly when they move beyond traditional approaches to include broader engagement strategies.
Incentives That Get People Excited
Most partner programs today are stuck offering the same typical rewards that worked ten years ago. Meanwhile, the programs that partners actually talk about and get excited about are doing something completely different.
The best partner programs combine cash rewards with recognition, progress tracking, and social elements. They use tiered systems that increase motivation as partners get closer to rewards, while leaderboards and peer recognition tap into natural competitiveness.
What you’re missing:
- Partners who actively promote your program to others, cutting recruitment costs
- Program loyalty that withstands competitive pressure
- The multiplier effect of partners who are genuinely excited about working with you
Data That Helps You Stay Ahead of Problems
Here’s the thing about partner problems: by the time you notice them in your quarterly reports, it’s already too late. The programs that stay ahead use data to catch issues while they’re still flexible.
Modern programs use data to catch issues while they’re still fixable, providing early warning systems with predictive analytics, partner insights for personalized communications, and A/B testing capabilities to optimize performance. As technology investments in program platforms increase, programs leveraging data and insights are gaining competitive advantages.
What you’re missing:
- Early intervention opportunities with at-risk top performers
- Budget optimization across different partner segments
- Real insights into partner motivations and preferences
Incentive Variety That Builds Real Relationships
If your incentive program is just “sell more, get more” or “do this, get that,” you’re missing the whole point. The programs that create real partner loyalty reward partners for building your business in ways that go way beyond just hitting sales numbers.
Programs that create real loyalty reward partners for building your business beyond just sales numbers. Great programs offer experiential rewards, business-building tools, training support, and relationship incentives for customer loyalty and co-marketing behaviors.
What you’re missing:
- Deep partner loyalty that survives economic downturns
- Strategic partnerships that drive mutual innovation
- A differentiated program competitors struggle to replicate
Modern Management That Works
If your team is drowning in spreadsheets and manual reward processing, you’re doing it wrong. The best programs run themselves so your people can focus on making the program better instead of just keeping it running.
If your team is drowning in spreadsheets, you’re doing it wrong. Today’s programs feature automated processing for communications and rewards, real-time dashboards, and scalable technology that grows without proportionally higher costs.
What you’re missing:
- Strategic focus instead of administrative busy work
- Rapid response capability for market opportunities
- Team bandwidth for program innovation and growth
The Real Math: Why “Good Enough” Actually Costs More
Need to see the actual numbers? This section shows the real financial comparison that changes everything.
Most program managers get the math backwards. They see the upfront cost of upgrading and miss the ongoing drain of standing still. Here’s the real financial comparison that changes everything.
What keeps incentive programs stuck: Upgrading feels expensive because you pay upfront and can see every dollar. Staying the same feels cheap because the costs are spread out, hidden and you can rationalize them as “just normal business stuff.”
The Hidden Costs of Standing Still
The problem with hidden costs is they don’t feel real until you add them up. But they’re eating your budget and competitive position whether you track them or not.
What you can see (and budget for):
- Current incentive program team member time and management
- Basic platform fees and manual process costs
- Standard reward delivery and processing
What you can’t see (but still pay for):
- The Performance Gap: Research shows that well-designed incentive programs deliver significant competitive advantages, while outdated programs miss out on these gains.
- The Digital Paperwork Tax: Staff time eaten up by manual processes that modern programs automate (usually 40-60% of program management time)
- The Competition Problem: Market share losses to competitors with better incentive programs that get partners excited
- The “We’re Stuck” Tax: Missing opportunities to try new strategies because your current setup can’t handle them
- The Recruitment Problem: It gets harder and more expensive to attract new partners when your incentive program feels “meh”
The True Investment in Better Incentives
Here’s what really matters: you’re not just buying a new platform or program – You’re buying back your competitive position and your team’s ability to focus on growth instead of maintenance.
What you pay upfront (and can see):
- Modern incentive platform setup with better engagement features
- A team training on using data to make your program better
- Expert help designing an incentive program that works
What you get back (but might not track):
- Time Freedom: Team member time is freed up for strategic work through automation
- Proven Performance Gains: Recent research shows that companies are increasing technology investments and strategic focus on program effectiveness
- Motivation Multiplier: Better engagement and word-of-mouth through programs that people care about
When Most Programs Break Even
The timeline for seeing returns isn’t as long as most program owners think, especially when you factor in the hidden costs you’re already paying for.
Based on research and our experience with hundreds of programs:
- In Months 3-6: Efficiency gains start offsetting setup costs
- In Months 6-12: Better partner engagement drives measurable revenue increases
- In Months 12-18: Major returns typically achieved through combined efficiency and growth
- Year 2+: Benefits keep compounding as better programs create lasting partner loyalty
What this means: The question isn’t whether you can afford to upgrade your incentive program – it’s whether you can afford to keep missing out while competitors build programs people love.
The Executive Patience Hurdle
The biggest risk isn’t the cost of upgrading – it’s running out of time before competitive pressure forces a crisis-mode overhaul that costs way more and takes way longer.
The Competitive Timeline:
- Today: Your incentive program is okay, competitors’ are okay, market share is stable
- Month Six: Competitors with modern programs start gaining partner preference
- Month Twelve: Market perception shifts from “programs are similar” to “some are clearly better”
- Month 18: Partner recruitment gets much harder as great programs set new expectations
- Year Two and Beyond: Market leadership gets entrenched, requiring complete overhaul to catch up
What this means for you: Executive patience runs out faster than competitive timelines play out. You have maybe six to twelve months to show meaningful progress before leadership starts questioning whether your program is worth the investment.
The companies that wait until Year Two to act often find themselves explaining declining market share to executives who are ready to cut the whole program instead of investing in fixing it.
Frequently Asked Questions
Q: How do I know if my channel incentive program needs an update?
A: If partners think of your incentives as routine instead of exciting, if you’re spending more time on paperwork than strategy, or if competitor programs are getting more buzz it’s time to look at improvements.
Q: What’s the difference between tweaking my current program and completely changing it?
A: Tweaks modify what you’re already doing within the same basic reward structure, while a real change redesigns the whole partner experience using what we know about motivation and modern technology. Successful programs are moving toward broader reach and strategic focus on culture and engagement.
Q: How long does it take to modernize a channel incentive program?
A: It varies based on how complex your program is, but research shows that companies investing in technology and strategic program design are seeing positive results, with most showing real improvements within the first few months.
Q: Will changing our incentive program mess up our current partner relationships?
A: Actually, well-planned improvements usually make relationships stronger. Studies show that companies are successfully expanding program reach to build stronger partnerships and culture.
Q: What kind of return should I expect from upgrading our incentive program?
A. Well-designed incentive programs deliver significant competitive advantages, with expanding reach beyond traditional sales focus to include culture building and broader engagement. Most organizations see positive returns within 12-18 months through better efficiency and revenue growth from partners who are more engaged.
The Bottom Line
The hidden price of standing still isn’t just what you’re spending on incentives – it’s what you’re losing while competitors build programs that partners actually love.
The Research Evidence
Decades of research makes this clear: companies continue to invest heavily in incentive programs because they remain effective tools for competitive advantage, but many don’t know how to create programs that actually work. Every month you wait to improve your channel incentive program, competitors with better, more engaging systems gain ground that becomes really hard to make up.
The Widening Gap
The evidence is overwhelming. Companies are successfully using well-designed incentive programs to drive business results and competitive advantage. The gap between “okay” and “great” programs keeps getting bigger and using behavioral science becomes standard practice instead of a competitive advantage.
The Final Math
The math is clear: the ongoing costs of keeping a “good enough” incentive program eventually cost more than upgrading to make it great. But more importantly, the missed opportunities – the partner loyalty, market share and competitive advantages you’re losing through boring incentive programs – often represent the biggest loss of all.
So What Do You Do Next? Here’s Your Action Plan
If you’re recognizing your program in this guide, here’s how to move forward:
Start With a Quick Health Check (This Week)
- Audit your admin time: Track how many hours your team spends on manual incentive tasks vs. strategic planning.
- Check partner engagement: Look at portal usage, email open rates and participation levels from the last 6 months.
- Review competitor intelligence: Ask your sales team what they’re hearing about competitor incentive programs.
- Assess technology gaps: List what your current platform can’t do that you wish it could.
Gather Your Evidence (Next Two Weeks)
- Calculate hidden costs: Add up staff time, workaround expenses and missed opportunities
- Document partner feedback: Collect recent comments about your incentive program (both positive and negative)
- Benchmark against modern programs: Research what top-performing programs in your industry offer
- Identify quick wins: Find two to three immediate improvements you could make with existing resources
Build Your Business Case (Next Month)
- Quantify the status quo cost: Use the hidden cost categories from this guide to show what “staying put” actually costs
- Define success metrics: Decide how you’ll measure improvement (engagement rates, partner retention, revenue impact)
- Research solutions: Whether that’s platform upgrades, expert consultation or internal program redesign
- Create timeline options: Develop six, twelve and eighteen month improvement scenarios
Take Action (Next Quarter)
- Start small or go big: Decide whether to pilot improvements what a segment or redesign the whole program
- Get expert help: Consider external partners that can best execute your plan
- Communicate changes clearly: Keep partners informed about improvements and timeline
- Track and adjust: Monitor results monthly and be ready to optimize based on what you learn
Ready to stop standing still and want take the next step forward?
Fill out the form below to speak with our experts, submit an RFP/RFI, or request more information. We’re here to help!
"*" indicates required fields
